Tools you can use.
LeadershipAnalysis™
LeaderAnalysis™ diagnoses the dynamics of any team from the perspective of the leader of the group. It does this by measuring the differences between the leader and (1) individuals on the team (2) subgroups formed by a subset of people within the group and (3) the with the group as a whole. It also considers (1) inter-group dynamics and (2) the degree that the leader differs from the average corporate citizen.
Other Reports
Report Details
LeaderAnalysis™ builds on the TeamAnalysis™ to be used in the field. It organizes all of the above elements and presents them in a logical, easy-to-understand diagnostic. The report presents this information in both textual and graphical formats. This provides multiple ways in which the diagnosis can be understood and applied to a variety of unique situations.
LeaderAnalysis™ can be applied to any situation where one individual is charged with or assumes a leadership position over a group of people. It is focused on the fundamentals which apply to any and all leadership situations. This means that it is compatible with any normative model (models that define the "right" way to do something by referencing some kind of standard) that might apply to a particular group, firm or industry.
How "I Opt" Works
"I Opt" information processing technology determines what a leader will pay attention (e.g., detail vs. central points) to as well as the likely focus of their final objectives (e.g., action, assessment, plans, etc.). These elements (as well as many others) determine both how a person can lead as well as where they will lead. Not all of the group members will have the same "how" and "where" preferences. Leading these other people toward the leader’s preference is an essential capability of leadership.
LeaderAnalysis™ is applies to all leadership situations. The only requires that the group be some kind of team. This means that members share a common purpose (e.g., goal, function, purpose, objective, etc.). All members must also be directly affected by the group outcomes--both positive and negative.
TeamAnalysis™ complements the Leader Analysis™ but they offer different, unique perspectives. TeamAnalysis™ focuses on the inherent, natural tendencies of a team being guided by group decision making. LeaderAnalysis™ adds the hierarchical element common to most business situations.
LeaderAnalysis™ is written in an accessible format using ordinary business language. The report does not require but benefits substantially from having counsel experienced in and knowledgeable of "I Opt" technology. The report is explicit but seasoned executives will typically reach beyond the items covered in the report. It is in this area that knowledgeable counsel proves of a high value.
LeaderAnalysis™ is designed to be of immediate interest and will typically command the leader's attention. It is operationally specific and comprehensive in scope. This means that demanding executives will find that it "speaks their language." Quantification, the use of graphics and the matter-of-fact tone make the report appealing to technically oriented managers and executives. Recommendations that are immediately useful and which are written at about a 9th or 10th grade reading level (the exact level depends on the content generated by the particular analysis) make the report universally appealing to anyone who takes leadership responsibilities seriously.
Obtaining a Report
People with an internet account can access the report directly from their Internet. Turnaround time is currently under 5 minutes.
Individual instance users can obtain the report from Professional Communications Inc. (the owner of "I Opt" technology) in any manner preferred by the client (e.g., email, fax, surface mail, private courier, telephone, etc.). Turnaround time is usually less than 24 hours. Contact us for more information.
Report Contents
Report Contents
The LeaderAnalysis is designed to be useful to all leaders. This means that it must have components of interest to leaders of all types, in all manner of industries, at all levels and who work in all cultures. It does this by adopting a balanced posture. There is something in the report that will be of interest to everyone. To achieve this, some people will find other things in the report superfluous, overly elaborate or perhaps too explicit. Accuracy will not be questioned. Presentation may be. This is the price of a universally applicable tool.
- LeaderAnalysis begins with an Executive Summary that outlines the report's major findings and recommendations.
- A detailed textual analysis (written in ordinary business language) provides an analysis of the relation of the leader to each member of the team, department or group. Observations and assessments are made as appropriate.
- The textual analysis also provides an analysis of the various dimensions of the group as well as for the group as a whole. Observations, strategies and recommendations to consider are offered as appropriate to the specific condition of the team.
- A dimensionality analysis compares the group to the leader along a variety of dimensions such as orientations toward change, planning/assessment, precision execution and rapid action. This quantification and explanation provides credibility as well as more detailed assessment/recommendations.
- The leader's "I Opt" profile is contrasted to the average corporate employee as well as to the group as a whole. This highlights the leader's uniqueness. It also points to the likely vulnerabilities and opportunities built into the leader's relationship to the group.
- Various group graphics are provided. They focus on team size, comparisons to other teams and a probably group temperament. All of these are framed in terms of their consequences for the leader.
- Various individual level graphics and assessments are provided. These include a communication compatibility matrix for all possible pairs of team members. They also include a "pinwheel" showing the relation of the overall profile of each team member to the leader. Finally, various bar charts and associated analysis isolate the likely overall compatibility of group members with each other.
The LeaderAnalysis™ was not specifically designed to be shared with all team members in a group context. Experience indicates that about half of the leaders will choose to share it. The other half use it as a personal guide or as a script for discussing their leadership strategy with their counselors, coaches or consultants. It is recommended that this issue be approached on an case-by-case basis.
Roll Over Thumbnails for More Information
The LeaderAnalysis report builds on the TeamAnalysis by focusing attention on the contribution of the leader to team, department or group performance. The report is designed to provide operational insights that the leader can use to structure a group for optimal performance.
Synergies, Vulnerabilities, and Strategies
The first page of this section is a one-page summary of the entire report. The probable relations of the leader to each team member is outlined and strategies that might be considered to optimize their contribution are offered. Relevant group dimensions are analyzed for exposures and opportunities with strategic options identified as appropriate.
This, as well as the rest of the report is written in ordinary business language and requires no background in "I Opt" technology to use. The recommendations and strategies are offered in a nonjudgmental, matter-of-fact manner and do not criticize nor will they offend the leader.
Dimensionality Analysis
The leader-team relationship is assessed on four basic "I Opt" dimensions. This includes their relative orientations toward change, planning/assessment, precision execution and rapid action. Potential leader-group differences (including possible coalitions) are identified and strategies suggested. Specific recommendations for leader action are given as appropriate.
This section provides quantifiable evidence for some of the recommendations and judgements made in the textual section of the report. It will be of especial interest to technically oriented managers and executives who may adopt an initial "Doubting Thomas" posture.
Individual and Group Profile Assessment
The leader is contrasted with an average person (n > 26,000). Differences and similarities highlight the uniqueness of the leader. This then calls attention to the need to consider how the leader's style might best mesh with that of the people being lead.
The leader is also contrasted to the team. The direction and magnitude of his or her likely influence on the group is quantified and objectively assessed. Potential difficulties arising from the degree or direction of the leader's "pull" on the group are isolated. This element of the report concludes with a summary statement of the leader's likely overall goal for the group as a whole.
General Group Graphics
LeaderAnalysis contains a variety of graphics and associated assessments that speak to various dimensions of leadership and the group that may or may not be highly relevant to a particular instance. Each graphic includes an explanation in ordinary business language that explains what is being addressed and offers advise and recommendations where applicable.
The effect of group size relative to the leader's strategic posture is assessed. Resulting structural issues, if any, are identified. The group is then compared with other teams and probable effects of group decision making are identified. Team members, including the leader, are compared to the group average to assess the likely group "temperament" and its effect on the leader's probable judgments.
General Individual Graphics
LeaderAnalysis also contains a variety of graphics and associated assessments that address individual relationships. This includes relationships between individual team members as well as between team members and the leader.
Graphic profile comparisons provide visual references to make visible differences and similarities. Bar charts identify pairs of team members falling in various structural compatibility categories. A communication compatibility matrix provides quantitative estimates by individual pairs of team, department or group members. Suggestions and observations are offered as appropriate.